Skip to Main Content

Student Guide to AI

Ethical Considerations

Ethical Considerations

According to the 2023 UNESCO's "Chat GPT and Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Quick Start Guide", the main challenges and implications of ChatGPT in higher education are:

  • Academic integrity
    • ChatGPT raises academic integrity concerns in higher education due to potential plagiarism and cheating. Reliable ChatGPT detection tools have yet to be developed.
  • Lack of regulation ChatGPT
    • ChatGPT's unregulated development raises concerns. Over 1,000 academics and leaders call for a pause to investigate risks and develop shared protocols.
  • Privacy concerns
    • In April 2023, Italy became the first country to block ChatGPT over privacy concerns and ethical issues regarding data collection and age verification, setting a precedent for AI-related data practices.
  • Cognitive bias
    • ChatGPT lacks ethical principles and can't differentiate between truth and bias or truth and fiction ("hallucination"). Critical analysis and cross-referencing with other sources are crucial when using its results.
  • Accessibility
    • Two main accessibility concerns for ChatGPT are restricted availability due to government regulations and uneven internet access, raising issues of equity and regional disparities in AI education and development.
  • Commercialization
    • ChatGPT offers both free and subscription options. Careful regulation is necessary for AI tools run by profit-driven companies, which may lack openness and use data for commercial purposes in higher education settings.

Adapted from AI Literacy and Critical Thinking, Macalester College Library.

As the use of generative AI has increased, the effects of this technology on the environment have grown.  The full extent of generative AI's energy consumption is not completely known yet. Obtaining clear data is a challenge as the AI industry isn’t  transparent, and energy use varies wildly by model size, location, and what stage it’s in (training an AI model uses much more energy than prompting a query).

The conversation is further complicated because what data is available can sometimes be manipulated by people who are hoping to prove a certain viewpoint. Another complication is that AI is used to create energy efficiencies and in the future might significantly contribute to energy and climate innovations. How might that be factored into environmental impact?

Recommended Reading:

EPA, Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator - Calculations and References, 2024

Ippolito, AI's impact on energy and water usage, 2025

Kamiya, The carbon footprint of streaming video, 2020

Lawrence, United States Data Center Energy Usage Report, 2016

Luccioni, Power Hungry Processing, 2024

Science News, Generative AI is an energy hog. Is the tech worth the environmental cost?, 2024

Tomlinson, Black, Patterson, et al., The carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans, 2024

What Uses More? > A calculator to compare the environmental footprint of digital tasks. The purpose of this app is not to pretend we know definitive measures of AI energy and water use, but to challenge our students to learn how dramatically various factors—like where you live or the type of prompt—can influence the footprint of both AI and non-AI tasks.

Adapted from AI Literacy and Critical Thinking, Macalester College Library.